Cases 1 - 10 of 2,375
Buchanan v. Becker et al
as 5:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Buchanan
Defendant:
Gregory W. Becker, Daniel J. Beck, Karen Hon and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Barbera v. Kate Bedrick PR, LLC
as 2:2024cv03505
Plaintiff:
Robert Barbera
Defendant:
Kate Bedrick PR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent:
GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others
Shortymacknifisent v. Fogarty
as 0:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
Kate M. Fogarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dillard v. Wray
as 24-50304
Plaintiff:
Carviel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Attorney General FNU Garland, Attorney General FNU Rosenblum and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
