Cases 1 - 10 of 2,655
Horta et al v. Kumar et al
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Hannah Anderson and Orlando Horta
Defendant:
Ravinder Kumar and Goyat Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jacoby v. Kumars et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00744
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiq, John Q. Hamm, Ms. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rohit Kumar v. Merrick Garland
as 24-5260
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States
Plaintiff:
Rohit Kumar
Malik v. Pediatrix Medical Goup et al.
as 5:2024cv01996
Defendant:
Tuscarawas County Prosecutor Attorney, Stark County Public Prosecutor, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rajesh Kumar Malik
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Malik v. Charles Schwab & Company
as 5:2024cv01997
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Company
Plaintiff:
Rajesh Kumar Malik
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mende v. Yum! Brands, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01117
Defendant:
Kumar Management, Yum! Brands, Inc. and Taco Bell Corp.
Interested Party:
Roland Thomason
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mende
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv07879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
