Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01893
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05799
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03435
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vyas v. Walters
as 2:2026cv00794
Petitioner:
Tarum Kumar Vyas
Respondent:
Joseph Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Henderson v. Kumar et al
as 5:2026cv07662
Plaintiff:
Johndell Henderson
Defendant:
Reetika K. Kumar, Salim Elhabaly, Jamaal Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KUMAR v. MULLIN et al
as 1:2026at02898
Plaintiff:
ASHWIN KUMAR
Defendant:
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, JOSEPH B. EDLOW and TODD BLANCHE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kumar v. Mullin et al
as 1:2026cv05709
Plaintiff:
Ashwin Kumar
Defendant:
Markwayne Mullin, Joseph B. Edlow and Todd Blanche
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
