Holland v. Bach et al
| Everett Loberiest Holland |
| Bach, F. Gonzales and Naranjo-Flores |
| 3:2007cv01362 |
| July 25, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Michael M. Anello |
| William McCurine |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER Accepting Report and Adopting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge; Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. This Order disposes of all remaining claims. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/8/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(pdc) (av1).
|
|
Filing
63
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by F. Gonzales, Bach, Naranjo-Flores. It is hereby recommended that the Court issue an Order: approving and adopting this Report and Recommendation and granting Defendants' Mo tion for Summary Judgment. It is ordered that the Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2009. It is further ordered that any Replies are due by 9/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 7/30/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(leh) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
