Hines v. Napolitano et al
| James Lynn Hines |
| Janet Napolitano, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bill Lockyear and Constance Piccinano |
| 3:2007cv01816 |
| September 14, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice: The Court dismisses the Petition without prejudice. As Petitioner was advised in this Court's 1/3/08 Order (9), the dismissal is without further leave to amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the val idity of his state court criminal conviction, he must start over by filing a new habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 which will be given an new civil case number. If he wishes to challenge the conditions of his confinement, he m ust file a new civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 which will also be given a new civil case number. The Clerk Of Court is directed to mail Petitioner a blank Habeas Corpus Petition form pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254, a blank Civil Complaint form pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and a blank Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/8/08. (Mailed indicated blank forms to Petitioner with this Order.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
