Throop v. Secretary of Corrections et al
| Edward Anthony Throop |
| Secretary of Corrections, Larry Scribner, Mark Bourland, Tim Ochoa, Gary Stratton, Manuel Tamayo, J. Gentry, J. Tyree, R. Parrilla, R Nelson, Jr., Everett Fischer, Kevin Shomura, M Ruff and DOES |
| 3:2008cv02109 |
| November 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kern |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for a Stay of Action. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for Stay is Denied to the extent it requires an indefinite stay of the entire action pending the outcome of Plaintiff' ;s Appeal in the Throop v. Woodford case. Plaintiff's Motion for Stay is granted to the extent it requests a limited stay so his case can be evaluated by Prison Focus. Plaintiff shall file a serve a status report advising the Court whether Priso n Focus has completed its evaluation of Plaintiff's case by 7/6/2012. All of the pre-trial dates and deadlines set in the 12/22/2011 Order are vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 522/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER denying 65 Request for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is Denied without prejudice for failure to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/4/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff 9;s retaliation claim against Defendants Scribner and Ochoa are permitted to proceed, however, the Court Dismisses all other claims. Plaintiff is Granted forty-five days leave from the date this Order is "Filed" in which to file a Second Am ended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading stated herein. Further, if Plaintiff's Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, it may be dismissed without further leave to amend. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/27/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
