Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Edward Throop v. Larry Scribner
as 13-55350
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SCRIBNER
Throop v. Diaz et al
as 3:2012cv01870
Petitioner:
Edward Anthony Throop
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Throop v. Francisco Jacquez, et al
as 10-55176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden and KATHLEEN A. PROSPER
Edward Throop v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-56068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR, STUART RYAN, Former Warden, GEORGE GIURBINO, Former Warden and others
Edward Throop v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-80114
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Respondent:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR
Edward Throop v. Secretary of Corrections, et al
as 09-55519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Former Warden, Calipatria State Prison, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BOURLAND, Former Associate Warden, Calipatria State Prison and others
Throop v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Throop
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Larry Scribner, Mark Bourland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edward Throop v. Larry Scribner
as 08-57027
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Warden
Throop v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv02109
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Throop
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Larry Scribner, Mark Bourland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01118
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
