Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
Bruce Derrick Calhoun |
Remax, Del Mar Ractrack and Casino, Google, Walmart, United States District Court Security, Judge Miller, SDSU, Ralphs, Microsoft, MTS, Palamar Medical Center Mental Health Unit, Harbor Police, San Diego International Airport, Judge Berry, Peachtree Inn, Sheriff, The entire Calhoun Family, Dell, Cox Cable, Hall of Justice, OSI U.S. Air Force, Central Jail, San Diego County, Symbolic Motor Car Company, San Diego Police, NBC San Diego and United Theaters |
3:2009cv01830 |
August 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Larry Alan Burns |
MJ xBencivengo |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #9 Notice of Document Discrepancy. Plaintiff refused mail. (pdc) |
Filing 9 Notice of Document Discrepancy Rejecting Document: Additional Information from Bruce Derrick Calhoun. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed; No proof of service; Caption reflects a different case name on page 2. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is NOT to be filed, but instead REJECTED and it is ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this order on all parties. No further filings to be accepted per #7 order issued 11/9/09. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules may lead to penalties pursuant to Local Rule 83.1., Rejected document was returned to the filer(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(pdc) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #7 Notice of Document Discrepancy. Mail sent to Bruce Derrick Calhoun. (pdc) |
Filing 7 Notice of Document Discrepancy by Judge Larry Alan Burns Rejecting Document: Unknown Document from Bruce Derrick Calhoun. Non-compliance with local rule(s): Not in proper format. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is NOT to be filed, but instead REJECTED and it is ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this order on all parties. Case dismissed on August 31, 2009. No further filings will be accepted in this case. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules may lead to penalties pursuant to Local Rule 83.1. Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 11/9/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(pdc) |
Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancy Rejecting Document: Letter to Judge Burns from Bruce Derrick Calhoun. Non-compliance with local rules: Improper format; Ex Parte communication prohibited; Action was dismissed with prejudice on 8/31/09. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is NOT to be filed, but instead REJECTED and it is ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules may lead to penalties pursuant to Local Rule 83.1. Rejected document was returned to the filer (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(pdc) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(pdc)(kaj). |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ORDER Dismissing Action With Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim and ORDER Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel: Because it is clear the defects in the Complaint cannot be salvaged by amendment, this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/28/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(pdc)(kaj). |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel by Bruce Derrick Calhoun. (pdc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bruce Derrick Calhoun. (pdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Bruce Derrick Calhoun (IFP Pending).(cge) (kaj). Modified text on 8/25/2009 (tkl). Low Number Order prepared 8/25/09 |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.