Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jerson Velazquez Ordonez v. James Cunningham, et al
as 26-12130
Plaintiff:
JERSON IMMER VELAZQUEZ ORDONEZ
Defendant:
JAMES ROBERT CUNNINGHAM, TRANTALIS AND ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS, GREGORY B. TAYLOR and others
Unknown:
SERVICE
Velazquez v. Uthmeier et al
as 9:2026cv80339
Plaintiff:
Jerson Immer Velazquez
Defendant:
James Uthmeier, Dean Trantalis, Gregory Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fyk v. American Neighborhood Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC et al.
as 0:2026cv60059
Plaintiff:
Jason Fyk
Defendant:
American Neighborhood Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC doing business as ANNIEMAC HOME MORTGAGE formerly doing business as FAMILY FIRST FUNDING, LLC, Change Lending, LLC, Family First Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Chan v. Campanelli, et al.
as 26-68
Plaintiff:
KEITH CHAN
Defendant:
JOY F. CAMPANELLI and REMAX, LLC
Chan v. Bacdayan, et al.
as 25-7925
Plaintiff:
YU HIN CHAN
Defendant:
KAREN MAY BACDAYAN, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN, CARMEN A. PACHECO and others
David Carpenter v. Mike Barton, et al
as 25-3387
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARPENTER
Defendant:
MIKE BARTON, 21-19989, 22-1485, RICHARD WALTER LONG, 21-19089, 21-19988, PAUL J. KILLION, 21-19290, 21-19990 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chan v. REMAX, LLC, et al.
as 25-7153
Plaintiff:
YU HIN CHAN
Defendant:
REMAX, LLC, named as Re/Max, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN, KAREN MAY BACDAYAN and others
Chan v. Bacdayan, et al.
as 25-6429
Plaintiff:
KEITH CHAN
Defendant:
KAREN MAY BACDAYAN, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN and REMAX, LLC
Velazquez v. Cunningham et al
as 0:2025cv62035
Plaintiff:
Jerson Immer Velazquez
Defendant:
James Robert Cunningham, Dean Trantalis, Trantalis and Associates Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
