San Roman v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Javier San Roman
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2009cv02400
Filed: October 27, 2009
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Referring Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 16, 2011 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Objection 1-Day Late; (2) Overruling Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; (3) Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; (4) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (5) Granting Commissioner's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc Nos. 16-20). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 2/15/2011. (knh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: San Roman v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Javier San Roman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?