Dejesus v. Cabales et al
| Leonso Dejesus |
| Cabales and Clark |
| 3:2011cv00423 |
| March 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Louisa S Porter |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER Dismissing First Amended Complaint For Failing To State A Claim Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b): An In Forma Pauperis appeal from this final order of dismissal would not appear to be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3). The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/25/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing No Initial Partial Filing Fee And Garnishing $350.00 Balance From Prisoner Trust Account (Re Doc. 2 ); And (2) Dismissing Civil Action For Failing To State A Claim Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) And 1915A(b): Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/18/2011. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR.) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
