Breland v. Tejada et al
| F. Lee Breland |
| Fox, M. Tejada, Does 1-5,000, Wright and Abrogate |
| 3:2012cv02929 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER denying plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff twenty-one (21) days leave from the date this Order is stamped "Filed" to prepay the $350 civil filing fee in full or to re-file a motion to proceed IFP. If Plaintiff fails to prepay the $350 civil filing fee or to re-file a motion to proceed IFP within that time, this action shall remain dismissed without prejudice without further Order of the Court . If Plaintiff pays the required filing fee, Plaintiff is required to serve Defendants; Plaintiff is not entitled to U.S. Marshal service on his behalf. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/20/13. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
