Roettgen v. Foston et al
John Roettgen |
D. Foston, R. Briggs, G. Hernandez, C. Davis, M. L. Lee (Number 48926), Picket, I. Bravo (Number 58541), P. Smith, Mueca, McDaniels, J. L. Tolbert, C. Ramos, R. Davis, D. Smith, L. Hinkle, J. Merchant, E. Garza, W. J. Sullivan and T. Kabban-Miller |
3:2013cv01101 |
May 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Gonzalo P. Curiel |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 126 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 120 Motion to Compel Production of Withheld Document; Denying as Moot 116 Non-Party Motion for Protective Order. Defendants must produce the portions of the document in question, as indicated, no later than September 16, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 9/9/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 123 ORDER Denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration. As for Plaintiff's request for an expanded definition of the term "untruthful," the Court finds that Plaintiff's request is MOOT because Defendants represented that they have produced all documents responsive to Plaintiff's expanded definition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 9/1/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 92 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Defendants shall submit a proposed protective order to Plaintiff for his signature no later than May 18, 2016. After execution by all parties, the proposed prote ctive order shall be submitted to the Court no later than June 1, 2016. Service of the documents ordered disclosed shall occur within seven (7) calendar days of when the Court signs the protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 5/4/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 74 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 63 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Untimely Motions to Compel: The Court denies Plaintiff's request to file a motion to compel regarding discovery propounded to V. Sosa and R. Olsen. Th e Court grants Plaintiff's request to bring an untimely motion to compel regarding documents withheld by Defendants on the basis of the official information and deliberative process privilege. Plaintiff must file his motion no later than Febr uary 12, 2016. Defendants must file their opposition no later than February 26, 2016. Briefing is limited to ten pages for both parties. Plaintiff must file a reply no later than March 11, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 1/11/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 54 ORDER Responding to 53 Plaintiff's Request for Ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 9/8/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Filing 48 ORDER: (1) Granting 42 Request for Leave of Court to Serve Defendant D. Smith; (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on D. Smith Pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and (3) Granting In Part and Denying In Part 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 8/14/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Filing 15 ORDER: (1) Denying as Moot 12 Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Amend; and (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of 14 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. This action is Dismissed as to previously-named Defenda nts D. Foston, R. Briggs, Mueca, McDaniels, C. Ramos, R. Davis, D. Smith, E. Garza, W.J. Sullivan, and T. Kabban-Miller. The Clerk is Directed to terminate these individuals as parties in this matter. The Clerk shall issue a summons as to Plaintif f's First Amended Complaint upon the remaining Defendants: G. Hernandez, C. Davis, M.L. Lee, J.F. Pickett, I. Bravo, P. Smith, J.L. Tolbert, L. Hinkle, and J. Merchant, and prepare IFP package. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/15/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Filing 7 ORDER: (1) Granting 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Dismissing Action Without Prejudice for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(b) & 1915A(b). Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days to file a First Amended Complaint. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal t o 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2); (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR) (approved form § 1983 civil rights complaint mailed to Plaintiff). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/23/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION For Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and/or Failing to Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days to pay the entire & #036;350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee in full, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/31/2013. Plaintiff provided with new IFP Form. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.