Asberry v. Cate et al
Plaintiff: Tony Asberry
Defendant: Denbella, Silva, Walker, D. Paramo, Matthew Cate, Chow, Newton and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2013cv02573
Filed: October 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Ruben B. Brooks
Presiding Judge: William Q. Hayes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER: The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 38 ) is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/22/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION For Failing To State A Claim And For Failing To Comply With Court Order Requiring Amendment: Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's 8/12/2014 Order directing him to file a Third Amended Complaint wi thin 45 days, it hereby dismisses this civil action without prejudice for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) and for failing to comply with a Court Order. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice and close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/28/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
August 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER 1) Dismissing Second Amended Complaint For Failing To State A Claim (Doc. 31 ) And 2) Denying Plaintiff's Motions For Physical Library Use And Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Docs. 26 , 29 ): The Clerk is directed to terminate this actio n as to Defendants Cate, Paramo, Denbella, Beard, Walker, Silva, Chow, and Newton, as well as to all John and Jane Doe Defendants. Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a Third Amended Comp laint which re-alleges his access to courts claims against Defendants Benyard, Allemby, Rutledge, Hernandez, Toledo, Godinez, Morales, and Taylor only, which adds no new claims or defendants, and which cures the deficiencies of pleading identified in this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/12/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
April 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: (1) Re-Opening Civil Action, (2) Granting Plaintiff's Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Re Doc. 10 ), And (3) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice For Failing To State A Claim Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) And 1915A(b): The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350 filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month&# 039;s income and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cu res all the deficiencies of pleading. Should Plaintiff fail to file an Amended Complaint within the time provided, the Court shall enter a final order dismissing this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim u pon which re1ief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) and Section 1915A(b). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/17/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDC R; per Order, a copy also was mailed to Secretary of CDCR.) (mdc) Modified on 4/22/2014 - Notified appeals clerk re this filing. (mdc) Modified on 4/22/2014 to note that the Order has been electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals via regenerated NEF. The USCA Case Number is 14-55476. (akr).
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER:(1) Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a); (2) Denying 3 Motion Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.65; and (3) DISMISSING Civil Action Without Prejudice For Failing to Pay Filing Fee R equired by 28 USC §1914(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days to pay the entire $400 filing and administrative fee in full, or complete and file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. Plaintiff provided new IFP Form. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/2/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asberry v. Cate et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denbella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Asberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?