Walker v. Hubert et al
| Jeff E. Walker |
| D. Hubert, C. Moore, Luna, Acuna, Labaco, Murphy, Donohue and John Jane Does |
| 3:2014cv00788 |
| April 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER Denying Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 115 ). While Plaintiff may choose to file a notice of appeal, the Court Certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order, as well as the Order denying Plaintiff's request for extension of time and t he Order granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/10/2016.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER Granting Defendants 51 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. The Court Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust his administrative grievances prior to filing this action as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/28/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 101 104 Motion to Request Access to a Typewriter and Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 2/12/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 64 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or for Preliminary Injunction without prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/20/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Denying Motion to Deny Extensions of Time as Moot; and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or for Preliminary Injunction without prejudice 25 38 40 . Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/11/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 17 21 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or for Preliminary Injunction without prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/16/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Motion is Denied pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 11/18/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: (1) Order to Show Cause Why Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Should not be Denied as Barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) Denying 2 5 Motions for Temporary Restraining Orders as Moot. Plaintiff has forty five (45) days from the date this Order is entered to file a declaration with the Court containing specific plausible allegations clearly demonstrating that he was in "imminent danger" at the time he filed this action. If Plaintiff fails to file this declaration, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/7/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION without prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 USC § 1914(a) and/or Failing to Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(a). Plaintiff Granted forty five (45) days leave from the date of this Order to prepay the $400 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP. If Plaintiff fails to follow this Order, the action shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 4/10/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Approved form served)(rlu) (per chambers, case remains open pending response from Plaintiff on 4/10/2014) (rlu).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
