Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc. v. Khem Precision Machining, LLC

Plaintiff: Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.
Defendant: Khem Precision Machining, LLC
Case Number: 3:2017cv01882
Filed: September 14, 2017
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Referring Judge: William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 14, 2017 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 5 Plaintiff's Tungsten Heavy Powder and Paris, Inc.'s ex arte application for expedited discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 11/14/2017. (jpp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc. v. Khem Precision Machining, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.
Represented By: Lisa S. Yun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Khem Precision Machining, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?