Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Tungsten Heavy Powder Special Master ProceedingIn re: Tungsten Heavy Powder Special Master Proceeding
as 23-80039
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TUNGSTEN HEAVY POWDER SPECIAL MASTER PROCEEDING
Petitioner:
GREGORY CAPUTO, Relator; Ex Rel. United States of America and GLOBAL TUNGSTEN & POWDERS CORPORATION, Relator; Ex Rel. United States of America
Respondent:
TUNGSTEN HEAVY POWDER, INC., DBA Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.
Pazos v. Tungston Heavy Powder, Inc., et al
as 23-8030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE PAZOS
Defendant / Appellant:
TUNGSTON HEAVY POWDER, INC., DBA Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc., TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC., RUSSELL LEWIS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH SEROV, AKA Joseph Sery
Pazos v. Tungsten Heavy Powder Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Defendant:
Joseph Serov, Tungsten Heavy Powder Inc doing business as Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc., Tungsten Parts Wyoming Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Pazos
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Gregory Caputo, et al v. Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc.
as 22-55142
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREGORY CAPUTO, Relator; Ex Rel. United States of America and GLOBAL TUNGSTEN & POWDERS CORPORATION, Relator; Ex Rel. United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
TUNGSTEN HEAVY POWDER, INC., DBA Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ex Rel.
Pazos v. Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01140
Defendant:
Joseph Serov, Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc. doing business as Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc., Tungsten Parts Wyoming, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
George Pazos
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc. v. Khem Precision Machining, LLC
as 3:2017cv01882
Plaintiff:
Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Khem Precision Machining, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
