Waggoner v. Target Corporation et al
Plaintiff: James Waggoner
Defendant: Target Corporation and Does 1 through 100
Case Number: 3:2018cv02444
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: M James Lorenz
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING ORDER Regulating Discovery and Other Pretrial Proceedings: Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 6/7/2019 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/28/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/4/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5B before Judge M. James Lorenz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman on 12/12/2018.(lrf)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ENTRY (MLG): On December 11, 2018, the Court held an Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference. The case did not settle. A scheduling order will follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman on 12/11/2018. (no document attached) (mjg)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman on 12/3/2018. (lrf)
November 29, 2018 Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Schulz, Peter) (sjt).
November 19, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Signature Certification by Target Corporation re #12 Joint Discovery Plan (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Schulz, Peter) (sjt).
November 15, 2018 Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Schulz, Peter) (QC mailer sent re: missing signature certification) (sjt).
November 7, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE to Federal Court of Filing in State Court by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service)(Schulz, Peter) (sjt).
November 6, 2018 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by James Waggoner re #8 Jury Demand (Bright, Ryan) (sjt).
November 6, 2018 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by James Waggoner re #7 Notice (Other) Notice of Association of Counsel (Bright, Ryan)(sjt).
November 2, 2018 Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by James Waggoner. (Bright, Ryan) (QC mailer sent re: improper signature, missing proof of service) (sjt).
November 2, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James Waggoner (Bright, Ryan)Attorney Ryan D Bright added to party James Waggoner(pty:pla) Modified to correct event on 11/5/2018 (QC mailer sent re: improper signature, missing proof of service, wrong event selected)(sjt).
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (MLG): Due to the Court's schedule, the Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference are reset to December 11, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. The ENE statements and joint discovery plan are now due December 4, 2018. All other provisions of this Court's October 25, 2018 Order (ECF No. 5 ) remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman on 11/1/2018. (no document attached) (mjg) Modified on 11/1/2018 (yeb).
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) For Early Neutral Evaluation Conference And (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference will be held on 12/3/2018 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. The Joint Discovery Plan is due by 11/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman on 10/25/2018.(lrf)
October 24, 2018 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (tcf) (jao).
October 24, 2018 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation. (tcf) (jao).
October 24, 2018 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Target Corporation. (tcf) (jao).
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2018-00042486-CU-PO-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11828961.), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2444-L-AGS. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(tcf) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waggoner v. Target Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Waggoner
Represented By: G Mark Tarpin
Represented By: Ryan D Bright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Peter J. Schulz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?