Yarbrough v. Ndoh et al
| Elbert Anthony Yarbrough |
| Ndoh and The Court of Appeal of the State of California |
| 3:2019cv00942 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Marilyn L Huff |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 2:19-cv-04551 (jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to the Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *Central District of California, Western Division*.*350 West 1st Street, Suite 4311**Los Angeles, CA 90012-4565*. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 5/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elbert Anthony Yarbrough. (anh) (jao). (Main Document 2 replaced to add pages 2-3 on 6/26/2019) (anh). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Ndoh, The Court of Appeal of the State of California, IFP Filed, filed by Elbert Anthony Yarbrough. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-942-H-JLB. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Elbert Anthony Yarbrough)[Case in Screening] (anh) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
