Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Yu v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-958
Petitioner:
DANIEL YU
Respondent:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, MARTIN GAMBOA, Avenal State Prison and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
Barrientos v. Ndoh
as 23-3221
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWIN PINEDA BARRIENTOS
Respondent / Appellee:
ROSEMARY NDOH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Neal-Williams v. Daramy et al
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
Rodjaun Neal-Williams
Defendant:
Officer Daramy, Officer Ndoh, Sergeant Ojo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon Blake v. Rosemary Ndoh
as 22-16346
Petitioner / Appellant:
GORDON BLAKE
Respondent / Appellee:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, Avenal State Prison
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01494
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01799
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01476
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Reinhold Mammoth v. Rosemary Ndoh
as 5:2021cv01641
Petitioner:
Michael Reinhold Mammoth
Respondent:
Rosemary Ndoh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
