Ryans v. Target Corporation et al
Jerlilia Ryans |
Target Corporation and DOES 1-50 |
3:2019cv01273 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Michael S Berg |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 pi |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference was held on 9/6/2019. The case settled. Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Jerlilia Ryans). (Defendant Attorney Jordan Nager). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (dxm) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting Joint Motion (ECF No. #10 ). Theodore R. Cercos is excused from attending the ENE and CMC set for 9/6/2019, provided that Jordan Nager attends the ENE on Targets behalf, along with the claims representative for Target. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 9/5/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Excuse Appearance of Theodore R. Cercos at ENE, by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service)(Yoon, Monica) (jrm). |
Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Yoon, Monica) (jrm). |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting in Part #7 Joint Motion to Continue. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference reset for 9/6/2019 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 8/1/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Continue (1) Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference and (2) Excuse Attendance by Corporate Representative by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of MJY, #2 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)(Yoon, Monica) (acc). |
Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference: Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 8/29/2019 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg. Joint Discovery Plan due 8/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 7/18/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Cercos, Theodore) (acc). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Monica Jeanne Yoon on behalf of Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Yoon, Monica)Attorney Monica Jeanne Yoon added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft) (acc). |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation. (als) (jao). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Target Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal. No Parties With Financial Interest. (als) (jao). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Diego, case number 37-2019-00028811-CU-PO-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12708520.), filed by DOES 1-50, Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Theodore R. Cercos in Support of Target Corporation, #3 Declaration Declaration of Daniel Moore in Support of Target Corporation's, #4 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01273-AJB-MSB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(als) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.