Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Bogart et al
| Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media |
| BSK Bullpen, Inc., Barry James Bogart, Jr., Scot David Kenin, BSK Bullpen, Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Bullpen Bar & Grill and Scot David Kenin individually and d/b/a Bullpen Bar & Grill |
| 3:2020cv00289 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0553 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Innovative Sports Management, Inc.. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BSK Bullpen, Inc., Barry James Bogart, Jr, Scot David Kenin ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13487488.), filed by Innovative Sports Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-00289-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Riley, Thomas)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
