State of California et al v. Abdel-Malak
| Federal Bureau of Investigations, County of Riverside, State of California, Superior Court of California For The County of Riverside, Riverside Sheriff Department, San Diego Police Department, United States of America, Department of Justice, Office On Violence Against Women and Riverside Police Department |
| Abanoob Abdel-Malak |
| 3:2020cv01426 |
| July 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Rejecting Document: Ex Parte Application to Appoint Legal Counsel, from Defendant Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case Closed per doc. No. #7 remanding to state court., Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/3/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2020: #1 Rejected) (anh).
|
|
Filing 9
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Rejecting Document: Ex Parte Motion Re Disqualification of Judge, from Defendant Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case Closed per doc. No. #7 remanding to state court., Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by the chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/3/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2020: #1 Rejected) (anh).
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Direct Appeal to Supreme Court by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (akr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Sua Sponte Remanding to San Diego County Superior Court, Central Division. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/28/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Michael M. Anello is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1426-CAB-BLM.(no document attached)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jmr) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER (1) recusing from case and (2) Requesting reassignment. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned to this case. Case reassigned to Judge Michael M. Anello. The new case number is 20CV1426-MMA(BLM). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/27/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (dlg).
|
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Michael M. Anello for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1426-MMA.(no document attached) (jmr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (vxc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (vxc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from United States District Court, Southern District of California, case number 20-cv-1035., IFP Filed, filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1426-JLS-BLM. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(vxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
