Dunsmore v. Gore et al
Petitioner: Darryl Dunsmore
Respondent: Gore and Xavier Beccera
Case Number: 3:2020cv02120
Filed: October 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Nita L Stormes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. The USDC has not issued or declined to issue a certificate of appealability in this appeal, which appears to arise under 28 U.S.C. 2254. This case is remanded to the USDC for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the court's earliest convenience. (akr)
December 11, 2020 Filing 6 USCA Case Number 20-56314 for #5 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr)
November 25, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Darryl Dunsmore as to #4 Clerk's Judgment. IFP Status. (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr)
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that The Court GRANTS Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ]. For the reasons discussed above, the Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. To the extent Petitioner wishes to challenge the conditions of his confinement, he must file a new civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, which will be given a new case number. IT IS SO ORDERED.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)(dsn)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] and Dismissing Petition Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/13/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (dsn)
October 28, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms)
October 28, 2020 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Gore, Xavier Beccera, filed by Darryl Dunsmore. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2120-CAB-NLS. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunsmore v. Gore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gore
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Xavier Beccera
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darryl Dunsmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?