Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Dunsmore v. Jones, et al.
as 24-1907
Petitioner:
DARRYL DUNSMORE
Respondent:
GENA JONES, Acting Warden at the California Health Care Facility and ROBERT BONTA
County of San Diego v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 24-894
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Interested Party:
DARRYL DUNSMORE, ANDREE ANDRADE, ERNEST ARCHULETA and others
Dunsmore v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 23-4308
Petitioner:
DARRYL DUNSMORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Not Classified By Court:
GENA JONES, Acting Warden at the California Health Care Facility and ROB BONTA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dunsmore v. Burton et al
as 3:2021cv02125
Petitioner:
Darryl Dunsmore
Respondent:
Robert Burton and Robert Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunsmore v. Burton et al
as 3:2021cv02025
Petitioner:
Darryl Dunsmore
Respondent:
Robert Burton and Robert Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Dunsmore v. Horn et al
as 2:2021cv01938
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dunsmore
Defendant:
Paul Horn and Jesse Underhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Dunsmore v. State of California et al
as 2:2021cv01711
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dunsmore
Defendant:
State of California, Burton, D. Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2020cv02200
Defendant:
San Diego County Jail, Michael Garcia, William Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins and Darryl Dunsmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dunsmore v. Gore et al
as 3:2020cv02120
Respondent:
Gore and Xavier Beccera
Petitioner:
Darryl Dunsmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
