3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 v. Toner et al
| 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated |
| Richard L. Stanley, Debra Toner, Kevin P. Carey and Richard Stanley |
| 3:2021cv01845 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Rejecting Document: Supplemental Brief in Reply to Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition, from Defendant Debra Toner. Non-compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7): Replies to Answers (sur-replies) are not permitted absent a Court Order. OTHER: Case was remanded to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Rejected Document) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #4 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/22/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (Certified copy sent to State Court via US Mail Service.) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 8
Minute Order Taking Motion Under Submission: Plaintiff's #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court is currently set for hearing on December 6, 2021. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required and the hearing shall be taken off calendar. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on November 18, 2021. (aw)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Debra Toner. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/15/2021. (tcf)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Defendant's Opposition and Objection to Remand, from Defendant Debra Toner. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/15/2021. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/18/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 5
REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Olinik, Michael) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Remand to State Court by 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Proof of Service)(Olinik, Michael) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael G. Olinik on behalf of 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Olinik, Michael)Attorney Michael G. Olinik added to party 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 (pty:pla) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Debra Toner.(jms)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand, filed by Debra Toner. (Filing fee $402 - receipt number CAS133585) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Receipt)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1845-MMA-AGS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(jms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
