Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Apkaki v. Proguard Protection Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Frederick Apkaki
Defendant:
Proguard Protection Inc., Robert Hall and Richard Stanley
Stanley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Richard Stanley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crawford v. Rowland et al
as 5:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Richard Stanley Crawford
Defendant:
Sgt. Adam Rowland, Matthew Whittington, Charlie Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Proguard Protection Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03694
Plaintiff:
Aaron Smith
Defendant:
Proguard Protection Inc., Robert Hall and Richard Stanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Case v. Pasha et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Trevor Case
Defendant:
Richard Stanley Pasha, William Sather, Dave Heffernan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 et al v. Toner et al
as 3:2022cv00189
Defendant:
Richard L. Stanley, Debra Toner, Kevin P. Carey and others
Plaintiff:
3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated and U.S. Financial, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 rl
3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 v. Toner et al
as 3:2021cv01845
Defendant:
Richard L. Stanley, Debra Toner, Kevin P. Carey and others
Plaintiff:
3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Richard Kaul, et al v. Federation of State Medical B, et al
as 21-7043
Defendant / Appellee:
Geico Indemnity, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Robert Garrett and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Arjun Kaul, M.D. and Arnold Erwin Feldman, M.D.
Richard Kaul, et al v. Federation of State Medical B, et al
as 20-7120
Defendant / Appellee:
Geico Indemnity, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Robert Garrett and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Arjun Kaul, M.D. and Arnold Erwin Feldman, M.D.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
