Myers v. Clayton et al
Raymond Dean Myers |
David Clayton, E. Brillo, R. Buckel, L. Rodriguez, Florez and Williams |
3:2022cv00673 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b). Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 6/07/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (smy1) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond Dean Myers. (smy1) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against E. Brillo, R. Buckel, David Clayton, Florez, L. Rodriguez, Williams (Filing fee $ 402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Raymond Dean Myers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-673-RBM-BLM. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.