Cases 1 - 10 of 41
David Clayton Jr et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05443
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Clayton, Jr and Shirley Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
USA v. David Conerly
as 22-16998
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID CONERLY, AKA David Clayton Conerly
Marple v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq01729
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Clayton Marple
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ratliff vs Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
David Clayton Ratliff
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff vs Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00019
Defendant:
David Clayton Ratliff
Respondent:
Warden C . Onwuka and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Clayton et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dean Myers
Defendant:
David Clayton, E. Brillo, R. Buckel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Felix v. Clayton et al
as 3:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Donald Felix
Defendant:
Medical Dr. David Clayton, S. Gates, Dr. S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54590
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DAVID CLAYTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
