Dominguez Orellana v. Garland et al
Ricardo Enrique Dominguez Orellana |
Merrick Garland, Donald W. Washington, Charles Wolf and Steven C. Stafford |
3:2022cv00823 |
June 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Dana M Sabraw |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ricardo Enrique Dominguez Orellana (Gonzales, Leah) (jpp). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Hearing:On the request of FD, Rule 5 Writ Hearing set for 6/10/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom 13A before Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw. (no document attached) (bjb) Modified on 6/6/2022 (bjb). |
Filing 3 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Ricardo Enrique Dominguez Orellana (Gonzales, Leah) (smy1). |
Filing 2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Ricardo Enrique Dominguez Orellana. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum)(sjt) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Merrick Garland, Steven C. Stafford, Donald W. Washington, Charles Wolf, No Fee Required. Filed by Ricardo Enrique Dominguez Orellana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:22-cv-823-DMS. Judge Dana M. Sabraw is assigned to the case. (Leah W. Gonzales)(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.