Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wolf et al v. City Of Port Arthur et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Abraham Charles Wolf and Rema Charles Wolf
Defendant:
City Of Port Arthur, Thomas Pierre Darlene, Ronnie Mickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lea Shawnette Gutierrez
Defendant:
Elvia Rodriguez, Charles Wolf and Winkler County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOLF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05563
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHARLES WOLF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolf v. City of Port Arthur
as 23-40528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rema Charles Wolf
Appellant:
Abraham Charles Wolf
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Port Arthur, Darlene Thomas-Pierre, Ronnie Mickens and others
Wolfe v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Charles Wolfe
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00823
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States v. Charles Wolfe
as 21-3147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Wolfe, also known as Chuck Wolfe
United States v. Charles Wolfe
as 21-3146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Wolfe, also known as Chuck Wolfe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
