Williams v. Brant et al
Tommy Lee Williams |
Brant, Aguinaga, Iwatsu, Unnamed, Garcia, Dias, Nares, Domkuct, Sheriff's Department MH and Jails, Mace, Gonzales, Powell, Saska, San Diego Central Jail, Garcia Avenila, Grace, San Diego Classification, San Diego Internal Affairs and San Diego Sheriff's Department |
3:2023cv00241 |
February 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
David D Leshner |
Todd W Robinson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tommy Lee Williams. (smy1) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tommy Lee Williams. (smy1) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Aguinaga, Brant, Dias, Domkuct, Garcia, Garcia Avenila, Gonzales, Grace, Iwatsu, Mace, Nares, Powell, San Diego Central Jail, San Diego Classification, Saska, Sheriff's Department MH and Jails, Unnamed (Filing fee $ 402, fee not paid, IFP not filed.), filed by Tommy Lee Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)The new case number is 3:23-cv-241-TWR-DDL. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/27/2023: #3 Exhibit Additional Counts) (smy1). Modified on 2/27/2023 to add docs per PSLC (smy1). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.