Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Alex Berg v. Patrick Bryant
as 26-2265
Defendant:
PATRICK BRYANT, JOHN OSBORNE, ERIC BOWMAN and others
Cross-Defendant:
NANCY RUTH MACE and MELISSA BRITTON
Plaintiff:
ALEX BERG
Pace v. Lane et al
as 3:2026cv02222
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
Warden C. Lane, A. John, Captain Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Mace
as 2:2026cv00984
Plaintiff:
Jared Mace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Haar v. Bowers et al
as 1:2026cv13748
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Defendant:
Fred Bowers, Ellen Mace-Leibson, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JONES v. DIMONTE M.D., et al
as 3:2026cv09824
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
R. DIMONTE M.D., ELLEN MACE-LIEBSO D.O., CAMILLA HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mace v. Unlimited Technology Systems LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00737
Plaintiff:
Debra Mace
Defendant:
Unlimited Technology Systems LLC and Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Kimberly Tate Fountain, as Personal Representative of Russell Scott Fountain, deceased v. Mace-Maldonado et al
as 1:2026cv00263
Petitioner:
Kimberly Tate Fountain as Personal Representative of Russell Scott Fountain, deceased
Unknown:
Bobbi Mace-Maldonado and Thomas J Seibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Boyd v. Rockstrem et al
as 2:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Christopher Boyd
Defendant:
Alex Rockstrem, Jennifer Gonzolez, WCC Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Mace Nosovitch
as 26-2412
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mace Anthony Nosovitch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
