Meyer et al v. United States Of America
| Michael Meyer and Ana Varela |
| United States Of America |
| 3:2023cv00396 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 t Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael Meyer re #2 MOTION to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem ad Litem, #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #4 Order on Motion to Appoint Guardian/Attorney ad Litem (Sagerian, Robert) (exs).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #2 Motion to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 3/2/2023. (exs)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (aas) (jms).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem ad Litem by Michael Meyer, Ana Varela. (aas) (jms).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against United States Of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17628122.), filed by Michael Meyer, Ana Varela. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-396-W-MDD. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Sagerian, Robert)(aas) (jms).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
