A.G. et al v. United States of America et al
| A.G. and R.G. |
| United States Postal Service and United States Of America |
| Alfonso Galindo, Jr. |
| 3:2023cv00745 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act (Definitions) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alfonso Galindo, Jr., A.G., R.G.. United States Of America served. (Moss, Noah) (aas).
|
|
Filing 4
Order Granting Petition for the Appointment of Alfonso Galindo, Jr. as Guardian Ad Litem for Plaintiffs A.G. and R. G. (ECF No. #2 ). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/27/23. (jmo)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (bdc) (sjt).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem ad Litem by A.G., R.G.. (bdc) (sjt).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against United States Of America, United States Postal Service ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BCASDC-17784351.), filed by A.G., R.G.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-745-JLS-KSC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Moss, Noah)(bdc) (sjt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
