Cifuentes v. Target Corporation et al
Ana Cifuentes |
Target Corporation, John Doe 1 and Does 2 through 50 |
3:2024cv00013 |
January 3, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Allison H Goddard |
Andrew G Schopler |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference ("ENE") and Case Management Conference ("CMC"). ENE set for 2/9/2024 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a CMC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 1/3/2024.(hmw) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by John Doe 1, Target Corporation. (stn)(jms). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by John Doe 1, Target Corporation. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (stn) (jms). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18467964.), filed by John Doe 1, Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Peter Schulz, #3 Demand for Jury Trial, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Proof of Service, #8 Table of contents The new case number is 3:24-cv-13-AGS-AHG. Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case.(stn) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.