D.T. v. County of San Diego et al
| D.T. |
| County of San Diego and Does 1 through 25 |
| 3:2024cv00304 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Defendant County of San Diego's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Claims form Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Rezvani, Sofia) (exs). |
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Pride, Jessica) (exs). |
| Filing 3 Defendant County of San Diego's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Claims from Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service)(Katz, Alexa) (exs). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Defendant County of San Diego's Proof of Service of Notice to Adverse Party and State Court of Removal of State Court Action to Federal Court by County of San Diego (Rezvani, Sofia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18591086.), filed by D.T.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-304-W-VET. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case.(rxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
