Crosby, et al v. Mills
RAYMOND BOSHOLD, KARL WARD, JO BOSHOLD, DR. JOHN HERZOG, LEE ANN DELCOURT, DAVID JONES, ARTHUR LANGLEY and RICK SAVAGE, individually and on behalf of all other identified class members, on behalf of TWO BROTHERS LLC d/b/a SUNDAY RIVER BREWING COMPANY |
JANET T. MILLS, Governor, State of Maine |
RICK SAVAGE, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members on behalf of TWO BROTHERS LLC doing business as SUNDAY RIVER BREWING COMPANY, LINDSEY CROSBY, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members, JAMES FAHEY, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members and MIKE MERCER, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members |
20-1822 |
August 31, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: John E. Baldacci for Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey, Mike Mercer and Rick Savage and Aaron M. Frey for Janet T. Mills. [20-1822] (ALW) [Entered: 10/22/2020 04:37 PM] |
NOTICE issued. After 10/16/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: John E. Baldacci for Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey, Mike Mercer and Rick Savage, Aaron M. Frey for Janet T. Mills and John E. Baldacci for Rick Savage. [20-1822] (ALW) [Entered: 10/02/2020 12:16 PM] |
MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey and Mike Mercer. Certificate of service dated 09/10/2020. [20-1822] (SCS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 12:21 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey and Mike Mercer. Brief and Appendix due 11/20/2020 for appellant Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey and Mike Mercer. [20-1822] (ALW) [Entered: 09/10/2020 02:12 PM] |
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey and Mike Mercer. Certificate of service dated 09/10/2020. [20-1822] (SCS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 12:17 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey and Mike Mercer filed by Attorney Stephen C. Smith. Certificate of service dated 09/10/2020. [20-1822] (SCS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 12:16 PM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 10/20/2020 for appellant Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey and Mike Mercer. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1822] (ALW) [Entered: 09/10/2020 08:49 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Janet T. Mills filed by Attorney Kimberly L. Patwardhan. Certificate of service dated 09/02/2020. [20-1822] (KLP) [Entered: 09/02/2020 01:45 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Janet T. Mills filed by Attorney Christopher C. Taub. Certificate of service dated 09/02/2020. [20-1822] (CCT) [Entered: 09/02/2020 03:26 PM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 26 (Order). [20-1822]. (ALW) [Entered: 09/01/2020 12:59 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #28) filed by Appellants Lindsey Crosby, James Fahey, and Mike Mercer. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 09/15/2020. [20-1822]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 09/01/2020 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.