Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jones v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2026cv13427
Plaintiff:
William David Jones
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones v. Freemont Investment & Loan et al
as 1:2026cv10695
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Freemont Investment & Loan, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-FRE1 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BICKEL v. WEBSTER et al
as 2:2026cv05920
Plaintiff:
DIANNE Y. BICKEL
Defendant:
DAVID WEBSTER, AKILI SNEAD, EDGARDO CORREA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jones v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv04976
Plaintiff:
Beau David Jones
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv05292
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE MARIE JONES and DAVID JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. McLennan County
as 6:2026cv00257
Plaintiff:
Michael David Jones
Defendant:
McLennan County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Jones v. School Board of Gadsden County
as 26-11227
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF GADSDEN COUNTY
Ryan Abair v. Neiman Marcus et al
as 5:2026cv01335
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abair
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus, 1stDibs, 24S and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
