Sanchez v. Brown University Health, et al
| JARED PIERCE SANCHEZ |
| BROWN UNIVERSITY HEALTH, BROWN UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CARE NEW ENGLAND HEALTH SYSTEM, CARE NEW ENGLAND HEALTH SYSTEM BOARD OF DIRECTORS, BROWN UNIVERSITY, WARREN ALPERT MEDICAL SCHOOL OF BROWN UNIVERSITY, ROXANNE VREES, MD, ALLAN TUNKEL, MD, CORPORATION OF BROWN UNIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Boston Office, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF RHODE ISLAND, JUDGE JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE WILLIAM J. KAYATTA, JR., JUDGE GUSTAVO A. GELPI, JR., JUDGE JULIE RIKELMAN, US SUPREME COURT, FORMER PRESIDENT JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., US FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, RI GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, GOVERNOR DANIEL J. MCKEE, MITCHELL R. EDWARDS, Esq., JOHN M. WILUSZ, HINCKLEY, ALLEN & SNYDER LLP, JOSEPH D. WHELAN, Esq., MATTHEW HAYES PARKER, Esq., WHELAN CORRENTE & FLANDERS LLP, JAMES A. MUSGRAVE, Esq., ROBERTS, CARROLL, FELDSTEIN & PEIRCE, INC. and CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES |
| 25-1496 |
| May 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jared Pierce Sanchez. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1496] (JW) [Entered: 09/03/2025 11:29 AM] |
ORDER entered: Appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is denied without prejudice for failure to submit a financial affidavit. A compliant request for in forma pauperis status consists of a motion and a fully completed Form 4, Financial Affidavit. A copy of Form 4 is enclosed to the appellant. Appellant's failure to either pay the $605.00 fee to the clerk of the district court or file a compliant request for in forma pauperis status by September 5, 2025 , will result in the appeal being dismissed for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [25-1496] (JW) [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:52 PM]
|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis, to transfer matter, Status Report and Exhibit filed by Appellant Jared Pierce Sanchez. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1496]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JW) [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:48 AM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 18 (ORDER adopting [16] Report and Recommendations; denying [13] Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and, denying as moot [14] MOTION to Transfer Appeal to a Non-Conflicted Court of Appeals or to Congress). [25-1496] (JW) [Entered: 08/12/2025 07:16 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #12) filed by Appellant Jared Pierce Sanchez. Fee due 06/12/2025. [25-1496] (JW) [Entered: 05/29/2025 10:51 PM] |
| A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellant Jared Pierce Sanchez. [25-1496] (JW) [Entered: 05/29/2025 11:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER entered: Appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is denied without prejudice for failure to submit a financial affidavit. A compliant request for in forma pauperis status consists of a motion and a fully completed Form 4, Financial Affidavit. A copy of Form 4 is enclosed to the appellant. Appellant's failure to either pay the $605.00 fee to the clerk of the district court or file a compliant request for in forma pauperis status by September 5, 2025 , will result in the appeal being dismissed for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [25-1496] (JW) [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:52 PM]