Daniel Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
| DANIEL D. DRAGASH |
| JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, STEPHEN M. WALKER, CHARLES E. ROBERTS, RODNEY K. MAY, ROBERTA ANN COLTON, THOMAS G. WILSON, VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, ROLAND E. SCHWARTZ, ROBERT KAHANE, MARIA CHAPA LOPEZ, ASHLEY B. MOODY and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 21-13760 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER:Appellants motion, dated October 28, 2021 and docketed November 1, 2021, which seeks to void the district court case, is DENIED. [ # 9532579-2 ] AJ, KCN and ELB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 12/17/2021 04:37 PM]
|
| EMERGENCY MOTION to stay further appellate proceedings filed by Appellant Daniel D. Dragash. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9554784-1] [Entered: 12/15/2021 03:06 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: Copy of motion to stay proceedings filed in the district court as to Appellant Daniel D. Dragash. [Entered: 12/10/2021 01:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for Federal Defendants [21-13760] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 11/24/2021 11:38 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for Federal Defendants. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13760] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 11/24/2021 11:39 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 11/22/2021 as to Appellant Daniel D. Dragash. [Entered: 11/22/2021 10:00 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Kristie Hatcher-Bolin for Roland E. Schwartz, individually. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13760] (ECF: Kristie Hatcher-Bolin) [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:26 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Kristie Hatcher-Bolin for JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13760] (ECF: Kristie Hatcher-Bolin) [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:24 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kristie Hatcher-Bolin for Appellees, JP Morgan Chase Bank and Roland E. Schwartz, individually [21-13760] (ECF: Kristie Hatcher-Bolin) [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:21 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daniel D. Dragash. [Entered: 11/16/2021 01:36 PM] |
| MOTION to Void USDC orders and remove USDC Judge from case filed by Appellant Daniel D. Dragash. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9532579-1] [Entered: 11/16/2021 02:37 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel D. Dragash on 10/25/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/16/2021 as to Appellant Daniel D. Dragash. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/23/2021 as to Appellees Roberta Ann Colton, et al. [Entered: 10/29/2021 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
