Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Daniel Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 21-13760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D. DRAGASH
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, STEPHEN M. WALKER, CHARLES E. ROBERTS and others
Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 8:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dragash
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Defendant., Stephen M. Walker, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kailey v. Ritter, et al
as 11-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL RITTER, ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, KEITH NORDELL and others
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Aristedes (I) Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brake Parts, Inc. v. David Lewis, et al
as 10-6531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRAKE PARTS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID LEWIS
Defendant - Appellant:
SATISFIED BRAKE PRODUCTS, INC. and ROBERT KAHAN
Wagner v. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv02501
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wagner
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, Travis Trani, James Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brake Parts, Inc. v. Satisfied Brake Products, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Brake Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Satisfied Brake Products, Inc. and Robert Kahan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Brake Parts, Incorporated v. Satisfied Brake Products,Inc et al
as 2:2010mc50354
Plaintiff:
Brake Parts, Incorporated
Defendant:
Satisfied Brake Products,Inc and Robert Kahan
Brake Parts, Inc. et al v. Satisfied Brake Products, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Brake Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Satisfied Brake Products, Inc. and Robert Kahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKinnon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Kendredge McKinnon, Sr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Ocwen, Structured Asset Securities Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
