Ernest Hoopengarner v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
| SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| ERNEST HOOPENGARNER |
| 20-1587 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time filed by Appellant Mr. Ernest Hoopengarner. Appellant's application for a certificate of appealability must be filed within 60 days of the date of this order. (JK) [Entered: 05/04/2020 11:10 AM]
|
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew J. Gonzalez on behalf of Appellee(s) Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, District Attorney Lancaster County, Attorney General Pennsylvania. [20-1587] (AJG) [Entered: 04/21/2020 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ernest Hoopengarner for a 60 Day Extension of Time to file Application for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 04/27/2020. Certificate of Service dated 04/16/2020. Service made by ECF. (JK) [Entered: 04/16/2020 06:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 03/20/2020 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 PARTIAL RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 03/17/2020 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ernest Hoopengarner in District Court No. 2-97-cv-06192. (LMR) [Entered: 03/17/2020 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
