Gary Seagraves v. District Attorney Lycoming Cty, et al
| GARY EUGENE SEAGRAVES |
| DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI |
| 20-1997 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Gary Segraves v. District Attorney Lycoming Cty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania and Kenneth A. Osokow, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania, District Attorney Lycoming County and Superintendent Houtzdale SCI requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 06/17/2020. (SLC) [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:04 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) no action will be taken on prisoner IFP Account Statement filed by Appellant Gary Eugene Seagraves as it is unnecessary. It is noted that the District Court previously granted Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (TMM) [Entered: 06/01/2020 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Gary Eugene Seagraves. (SLC) [Entered: 05/19/2020 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Gary Eugene Seagraves in District Court No. 3-17-cv-00084. (SLC) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
