Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Tarik Bagley v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-3366
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Plaintiff:
TARIK BAGLEY
Luis Alamo v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-3279
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
LUIS E. ALAMO
Mark Edwards v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-2993
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
MARK S. EDWARDS
David King v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-2901
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CAMBRIA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Plaintiff:
DAVID KING
Robert Davis v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-2845
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
George Druck v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
as 24-2045
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DRUCK
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Jose Mendez v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1472
Plaintiff:
JOSE MENDEZ
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Montez Bethea v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ BETHEA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Frank Tepper v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1271
Plaintiff:
FRANK TEPPER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jody Witter v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 23-3116
Petitioner / Appellant:
JODY D. WITTER
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
