Londell Bond v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: LONDELL BOND
Case Number: 21-1027
Filed: January 7, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (Clerk) The motion is granted. Appellants application for a certificate of appealability must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date of this order. In the event Appellant is unable to file the application within the time stated, a renewed motion for extension of time may be filed provided that the motion sets forth good cause and is filed no later than three (3) days prior to the deadline. If Appellant does not file an application for a certificate of appealability or a renewed motion by the deadline established, Appellants notice of appeal will be deemed to be such an application and will be submitted by the Clerk of this Court to a panel of the Court for consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2), filed. (PDB) [Entered: 01/19/2021 11:07 AM]
January 12, 2021 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Laura Zipin on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Dallas SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [21-1027] (LZ) [Entered: 01/12/2021 11:38 AM]
January 8, 2021 Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect AND for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 01/08/2021 05:08 PM]
January 7, 2021 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 01/07/2021 09:09 AM]
January 7, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Londell Bond in District Court No. 2-13-cv-01553. (PDB) [Entered: 01/07/2021 09:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Londell Bond v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI
Represented By: Laura Zipin Esq.
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Represented By: Anne Palmer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Represented By: Laura Zipin Esq.
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Represented By: Anne Palmer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Represented By: Laura Zipin Esq.
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Represented By: Anne Palmer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LONDELL BOND
Represented By: Londell Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?