Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Raymond David v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAVID
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Edgardo Rivera v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1750
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO SOBRADO RIVERA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
LG Street v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1326
Plaintiff:
LG STREET
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Lamar Benton v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BENTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Donald Evans v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1158
Plaintiff:
DONALD EVANS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Sean Darrington v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 23-2645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN DARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
John Taylor v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 23-2511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN JUNIOR TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Lamont Cherry v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 23-2512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT CHERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kevin Cannady v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 23-2471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN CANNADY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Debtor / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas WashamIn re: Thomas Washam
as 23-2264
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS WASHAM
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
