Jorge Cintron v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
| JORGE CINTRON |
| SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 23-2936 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 LETTER from Appellant Jorge Cintron titled, "Verification of Continuing In Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal". Service made on 12/18/2023 by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 12/26/2023 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellant Jorge Cintron for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 01/02/2024. Certificate of Service dated 12/18/2023. Service made by US mail. (AMR) [Entered: 12/26/2023 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 12/06/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Katherine Ernst on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Phoenix SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [23-2936] (KEE) [Entered: 12/06/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 COPY OF OPINION/ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT declining the issue a certificate of appealability dated 11/03/2023 signed by Goldberg. (AMR) [Entered: 11/29/2023 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT received from Appellant Jorge Cintron. (AMR) [Entered: 11/29/2023 04:26 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) remanding appeal to District Court for the purpose of either issuance of a certificate of appealability or a statement of reasons why one should not issue. The appeal is STAYED pending determination by the District Court. It is ordered that the parties file a status report to be filed on or before 12/01/2023 and every 30 days thereafter until a determination is made by the District Court. (AMR) [Entered: 11/01/2023 12:23 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) Appellant was housed at Graterford State Correctional Institution (SCI) when he filed the underlying habeas petition, and named the Superintendent of Graterford as the Respondent. It is noted that Graterford ceased operations on July 15, 2018. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Petitioners new facility, Phoenix SCI, has been substituted into the case and caption as the Appellee. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004). It is noted that the Superintendent has been added by title, not name. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). Any objections to this order must be filed and served within seven (7) days of the date of this order. (AMR) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:47 PM]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jorge Cintron in District Court No. 2-05-cv-03478. (AMR) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
