Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jorge Cintron v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 23-2936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE CINTRON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Stewart v. Bishop et al
as 3:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Stewart
Defendant:
Renee E. Bishop, Deutsche National Bank Trust, PHH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jorge CintronIn re: Jorge Cintron
as 21-1961
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
In re: JORGE CINTRON
Jorge CintronIn re: Jorge Cintron
as 21-1170
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JORGE CINTRON
Jorge Cintron v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 19-2911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE CINTRON
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI
Owens v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Joe Ganim, City of Bridgeport, A. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosado-Rios v. Vazquez-Collazo
as 3:2014cv01820
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosado-Rios , Victor M. Torres-Gonzalez , Jorge Cintron-Gomez and others
Defendant:
Javier Vazquez-Collazo, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jorge Cintron v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 14-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE CINTRON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
CINTRON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2013cv03322
Petitioner:
JORGE CINTRON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Jorge Cintron
as 13-1671
Petitioner:
In re: JORGE CINTRON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
