EagleBank v. Jonathan Korman
Plaintiff - Appellee: EAGLE BANK
Defendant - Appellant: JONATHAN S. KORMAN
Case Number: 13-2051
Filed: August 22, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 4, 2014 EagleBank v. Jonathan Korman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 404918372 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: 8:12-cv-03449-PWG, 09-13311, 09-13353, 09-00786, 09-00362. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999330217]. [13-2051]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: EagleBank v. Jonathan Korman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: EAGLE BANK
Represented By: James Martin Hoffman
Represented By: Bryn Hope Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JONATHAN S. KORMAN
Represented By: Thomas Francis DeCaro
Represented By: Marla Lynn Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?