Cases 1 - 10 of 35
DURU v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00486
Defendant:
MARK S. ZEMELMAN, H.R. OF SAINT JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION COLORADO and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
First Horizon Bank v. Eagle Bank and Trust Company et al
as 4:2020cv01371
Defendant:
Debra A Reed and Eagle Bank and Trust Company
Plaintiff:
First Horizon Bank
Ager et al v. Eagle Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Samantha Perry, Silver Lake LLC, Arlington Realty Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lajonne Ager and Wayne B. Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Glen Flora Dental Center, Ltd. et al v. First Eagle Bank et al
as 1:2017cv09161
Plaintiff:
Glen Flora Dental Center, Ltd. , River West Smile Center, Ltd. , Oral Kare Network II, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
First Eagle Bank , Larry Kelliher, Mikki Francione and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Clancy v. American Eagle Bank et al
as 1:2017cv08772
Plaintiff:
Patrick Clancy
Defendant:
American Eagle Bank , Equitable Services, Inc. and Village of Fox Lake, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandy Dailey v. Michael Walsh, et al
as 16-3211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brandy Dailey
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Walsh and Eagle Bank and Trust Company of Jefferson County
Dailey v. Walsh
as 4:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
Brandy Dailey
Defendant:
Michael Walsh and Eagle Bank and Trust Company of Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
